under construction go to the first page of this article or
check

https://www.google.de/search?q=Supporte … e:official

EARTH NEED A CHANGE! So you start with a click on  this pic for more information service this is the SD_ECBS FREE DATABASE presented on facebook for nonprofit earth-optimizing reasons. STUDY THE COMMENT-FEEDS OF OUR ALBUMS. THATS FASTER THAN YOU SEARCH FOR ALL DATA! TELL YOUR FRIENDS. SUPPORT US!

Donate on googles
http://free-internet-is-a-human-right.blogspot.de/

HIGH TECHNOLOGY EGYPT AS A POSSIBLE PROOF FOR EXTRATERRISTRIAL IMPACT

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid … =1&theater

Brien Foerster
These are the tool marks at the Aswan rose granite quarry in Egypt. Conventional scholars say these were achieved with stone balls; looks FAR MORE like machining technology to me. Come and see for yourself: http://khemitology.com/wp-content/uploa … our-II.pdf


more about Brien
Board link: Topic



THE US FBI UFO-DISCLOSURE
http://www.fbi.gov/fbi-search?cx=004748 … 2F&q=u.f.o

under construction go to the first page of this article or
check

https://www.google.de/search?q=Supporte … e:official

EARTH NEED A CHANGE! So you start with a click on  this pic for more information service this is the SD_ECBS FREE DATABASE presented on facebook for nonprofit earth-optimizing reasons. STUDY THE COMMENT-FEEDS OF OUR ALBUMS. THATS FASTER THAN YOU SEARCH FOR ALL DATA! TELL YOUR FRIENDS. SUPPORT US!

Donate on googles
http://free-internet-is-a-human-right.blogspot.de/


HITLER FBI FILES DISCLOSURE
http://illuminatireview.com/fbi-declass … e-germany/

SPECIAL SERVICE OF THE SD_ECBS NEWS AGENCY
CRIMEA NEWS FEED 1

HISTORY
http://anton-dion.blogspot.de/2014/03/c … l?spref=fb


NEWS FOR UKRAINE (GREAT MILITARY RUSSIAN INTERVENTION POSSIBLE THIS WEEKEND) 08-03-2014

All because the russian rubel is down since one year and to prevent inner revolution in Russia. That poor british connon-boat-policy. Nothing more..
You really ask yourself why the Ukrainian government did not immediately declared martial law. Jaruzelksi prevented in 1981 against a possible russian intervention in Poland against Solidarnosc and democratization in Poland. A Russian military intervention would be in Ukraine also not possible. If Putin just think he can do all this now like his friends of the hells angels he need medical help!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo5_ct7R6Ng
http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_putin_hu.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VokyM3YF … e=youtu.be
http://anton-dion.blogspot.de/2014/03/c … l?spref=fb

That is certainly what nonsense Kissinger as are of themselves. The fact is that he is active NWO operator and provide this Propanganda Putin time and space wants his
To realize NWO goals in Russian Baltic area and that is the DC circuit

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid … =3&theater

Well then he has probably unmasked Putin as NWO activists. Under Nixon, Kissinger was such a great man as US-minister for foreign affairs. Kissinger has become so much dirt on the plug, not at all because I understand why he volunteers at all to word. The Fact-Finding Commission of 9/11, he has also directed. Any questions? This 300 billion bank robbery, in which 3500 people died

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo5_ct7R6Ng

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VokyM3YF … e=youtu.be

If one wants war fell anyway everything is agreed among the powers. Of course, at the time the Olympics is all this happening. Just as Chechnya. Was also during olympic Winter Games.

http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_putin_hu.jpg

With the invasion of Russian troops in the Crimea were violations against the BUDAPEST MENORANDUM of 1994.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._ … Assurances

It is not justifiable under international law. The Ukrine are politically still too unstable to be one among the many verscheidennen faith and ethnic communities reached by plebiscites in the crisis areas something useful. In all eastern Ukrainian regions such polls were run in favor of Russia. , What that means also that all such Ukriane economic strength makes up as the Tupolev aircraft plants, the tank industry, the granaries and the oil fields will be lost in the Crimea and can not contribute to the economic stabilization of Ukraine.


"THAT IS OF COURSE NOT THE RIGHT WAY. IN A TIME WHEN SNIPERS KILLED PEOPLE OF KIEV NOONE KNOWS WHO IS BEHIND AND SOLDIES WITHOUT ANY SIGNS ON UNIFORMS OCCUPY THE UKRAINE COUNTRY I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE  REAL VOTING FOR RUSSIA!!!


"The largest region Donbass / Donetsk: The people speaks decided for military aid from Russia and more than 50,000 citizens are in favor of a fall of leveraged fadchistischen and not for a referendum on the independence of Donbass and a possible accession to the Russian Federation legitimate! puppet government in Kiev! people are willing Kiev to storm, Today and over 100,000 people were gathered in Kharkov and liberated buildings that were occupied by 400 armed fascists! popular uprisings in Lugansk, Mariuopol, Crimea, Odessa, Krivoy Rog and Sumy! ! "SV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiEVK27-5oM

The fact is that originally guaranteed with the opening of Eastern Europe, NATO, the States has no military take over. Have you made ​​but then slowly but. But no wonder Is that Putin is annoyed ... http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnerschaft_f% C3% BCr_den_Frieden



Official Washington, including its compliant mainstream media, paints Moscow as the “black hat” in the Ukraine crisis but the fuller picture would show that the supposed U.S. “white hats” are the ones who have violated the deal that ended the Cold War.' ~

Melvin A. Goodman is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and an adjunct professor of government at Johns Hopkins University. He was a CIA analyst from 1966 to 1990, and a professor of international security at the National War College from 1986 to 2004.

Twenty years ago, the collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union marked a virtual end to the long-standing military and ideological threat that Moscow represented to the United States.

Yet, instead of “anchoring” Russia to the political and economic architecture of the Western alliance system, which George F. Kennan’s “containment doctrine” endorsed, successive U.S. administrations have not only kept the Kremlin at arm’s length but have drawn the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) closer to Russia itself. This is central to the current crisis over Crimea.

In expanding NATO, the United States has been guilty of betraying a guarantee that Secretary of State James Baker gave to Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze in 1990, when the United States stated that it would not “leapfrog” over East Germany to place U.S. military forces in East Europe in the wake of the Soviet military withdrawal from Germany.

The administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush ignored that commitment when the United States sponsored the entry of eight former Warsaw Pact members as well as three former Soviet Republics into NATO. The Obama administration, meanwhile, appears ignorant of the geopolitical context of its foreign policies, which have not taken this betrayal into account in the Crimean crisis.

President Clinton seemingly had no appreciation of the great difficulty involved in Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev’s acceptance of the unification of Germany and German membership in NATO in view of Russian historical memories and huge World War II losses. One of the few sources of Soviet pride in foreign policy was the Soviet defeat of the German Wehrmacht, which was the key to the U.S. and British victory on the Western front. Three-fourths of the German Army fought on the Eastern front, and three-fourths of German losses took place on the Eastern front.

U.S. diplomats and academics, particularly those with expertise in European policy and the Soviet Union such as George Kennan, made a valiant effort to convince President Clinton that the expansion of NATO was bad strategic policy. Even members of the administration, including Secretary of Defense William Perry, tried to dissuade the President from his strategic blunder. In using military power against Serbia in the late 1990s, Clinton seemed to have no idea of the long historical ties between Russia and Serbia.

President Bush made further significant contributions to the alienation of the new Russian leadership by sponsoring NATO membership for former Soviet Republics (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania); abrogating the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which was the cornerstone of strategic deterrence; and deploying a national missile defense system in California and Alaska.

The Bush administration’s disdain for multilateral diplomacy and arms control, as well as its reliance on the use of force, particularly the unnecessary war against Iraq, angered the Russian leadership as well as many European leaders. President Bush explained that national missile defense as well as the regional missile defense in East Europe would not be aimed at Russia, but rather  the “world’s least-responsible states,” which the President did not name. Of course, no one in the Kremlin believed him.

While a warning to Russia, the Bush administration was a welcome relief to the neoconservative community. The appointment of right-wing ideologues who brandished a deep animosity to the Russian state included Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretaries of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Robert Gates, CIA Director Porter Goss as well as such Pentagon luminaries as Douglas Feith, William Luti, and Abram Shulsky.

In his memoir Duty, Gates prides himself for opposing any improved relations with Russia, since “making the Russians happy wasn’t exactly on my to-do list.” During meetings with his Russian military counterparts, Gates passed a childish and churlish note to Secretary of State Condi Rice stating “I’d forgotten how much I really don’t like these guys.” President Bush even favored the expansion of NATO into Ukraine and Georgia, and U.S. military support for Georgia played a significant role in the five-day war between Russia and Georgia in 2008.

President Obama initially received some credit for pushing the “reset” button in relations with Russia, but it was soon obvious that the button was simply symbolic and that no effort was being made to institutionalize bilateral relations. The Obama administration also ignored Secretary of State Baker’s verbal commitment against “leapfrogging” over a united Germany by basing U.S. fighter jets in Poland as well as favoring the deployment of a sophisticated regional missile defense in Poland and the Czech Republic. He is using the Crimea crisis to base additional fighter jets in Poland and is considering the expansion of fighter patrols over the Baltic States.

At present, there is no U.S. ambassador in Russia, and Secretary of State John Kerry has been holding talks with his Russian counterpart without any senior Russian experts at his side. The intemperate remarks of Kerry’s assistant secretary of state for European affairs last month as the crisis in Kiev was worsening speaks to the lack of diplomatic experience at Foggy Bottom.

During the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, a former U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union played a key role in convincing President John F. Kennedy that, if the United States gave Moscow some diplomatic room, the Kremlin would find a way to withdraw its missiles and bombers from Cuba – and thus avoid a military confrontation.

In the Crimean crisis, President Obama seems to be unnecessarily accommodating the right-wing criticism of his administration from politicians and pundits instead of finding a diplomatic solution to the current imbroglio. If the United States offered guarantees against the further expansion of NATO and invited Russia to take part in a multilateral economic aid program for beleaguered Ukraine, then it is possible that President Vladimir Putin would find a way to lower the Russian military presence in the Crimea.

In the meantime, the U.S. reliance on modest military steps, travel bans and economic sanctions will not bring any favorable change to the situation on the ground in Crimea. These steps will only worsen the crisis in the Ukraine and ensure that the United States and Russia cannot discuss important geopolitical matters on arms control and disarmament, nonproliferation and counter-terrorism, which finds them essentially in agreement.

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/11-1

More in the newsfeed
Board link: Topic

https://www.facebook.com/groups/209226609114914/





RESERACH
http://www.hdg.de/lemo/html/WegeInDieGe … erung.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnership_for_Peace
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/11-1
https://www.google.de/search?q=Gatantie … al&spell=1



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wigDHjEwPuE

Ron Paul concerning  the situation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MgnMlaJPjs

NEWS FOR UKRAINE (GREAT MILITARY RUSSIAN INTERVENTION POSSIBLE THIS WEEKEND) 08-03-2014
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid … =3&theater
http://time.com/16294/russia-crimea-sevastopol/

Well then he has probably unmasked Putin as NWO activists. Under Nixon, he was such a great man. Kissinger has become so much dirt on the plug, not at all because I understand why he volunteers at all to word. The Fact-Finding Commission of 9/11, he has also directed. Any questions? This 300 billion bank robbery, in which 3500 people died ....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo5_ct7R6Ng

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VokyM3YF … e=youtu.be

If one wants war fell anyway everything is agreed among the powers. Of course, the Olympics is aggiert. Just as Chechnya. Was also to olypischen Winter Games.
http://www.texemarrs.com/images/bush_putin_hu.jpg

With the invasion of Russian troops in the Crimea were violations against the BUDAPEST MENORANDUM of 1994.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._ … Assurances


It is not justifiable under international law. The Ukrine are politically still too unstable to be one among the many different faith and ethnic communities reached by plebiscites in the crisis areas something useful. In all eastern Ukrainian regions such polls were run in favor of Russia. , What that means also that all such Ukriane economic strength makes up as the Tupolev aircraft plants, the tank industry, the granaries and the oil fields will be lost in the Crimea and can not contribute to the economic stabilization of Ukraine.

RUSSIAN TROUPS ATTACK UKRAINE MILITARY BASE

GERMAN FEED
http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/arti … basis.html


REUTERS FEED
http://live.reuters.com/Event/World_News



THATS RIDICULOUS
PUTIN NOMINATED FOR NOBEL PRIZE? I think it is too late for this
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/2491748 … eace-prize

CRIMEA NEWS 2
LATEST 04-15-2014
"Moscow, April 14. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia’s strategic missile force and air and space defence force have test-launched an inter-continental ballistic missile RS-24 with a multiple warhead from the Plesetsk space site. http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/727666

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2 … _arms.html

LATEST 03-04-2014
http://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-maneu … ia/5376482

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/w … e_03292014
MARCH 2014
http://anton-dion.blogspot.de/2014/03/c … l?spref=fb

HAHA Joke of the day!!.Better say Russian out of Crimea / China out of Tibet!!.............
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti … a/SFG1ppfN


Official Washington, including its compliant mainstream media, paints Moscow as the “black hat” in the Ukraine crisis but the fuller picture would show that the supposed U.S. “white hats” are the ones who have violated the deal that ended the Cold War.' ~

Melvin A. Goodman is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and an adjunct professor of government at Johns Hopkins University. He was a CIA analyst from 1966 to 1990, and a professor of international security at the National War College from 1986 to 2004.

Twenty years ago, the collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union marked a virtual end to the long-standing military and ideological threat that Moscow represented to the United States.

Yet, instead of “anchoring” Russia to the political and economic architecture of the Western alliance system, which George F. Kennan’s “containment doctrine” endorsed, successive U.S. administrations have not only kept the Kremlin at arm’s length but have drawn the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) closer to Russia itself. This is central to the current crisis over Crimea.

In expanding NATO, the United States has been guilty of betraying a guarantee that Secretary of State James Baker gave to Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze in 1990, when the United States stated that it would not “leapfrog” over East Germany to place U.S. military forces in East Europe in the wake of the Soviet military withdrawal from Germany.

The administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush ignored that commitment when the United States sponsored the entry of eight former Warsaw Pact members as well as three former Soviet Republics into NATO. The Obama administration, meanwhile, appears ignorant of the geopolitical context of its foreign policies, which have not taken this betrayal into account in the Crimean crisis.

President Clinton seemingly had no appreciation of the great difficulty involved in Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev’s acceptance of the unification of Germany and German membership in NATO in view of Russian historical memories and huge World War II losses. One of the few sources of Soviet pride in foreign policy was the Soviet defeat of the German Wehrmacht, which was the key to the U.S. and British victory on the Western front. Three-fourths of the German Army fought on the Eastern front, and three-fourths of German losses took place on the Eastern front.

U.S. diplomats and academics, particularly those with expertise in European policy and the Soviet Union such as George Kennan, made a valiant effort to convince President Clinton that the expansion of NATO was bad strategic policy. Even members of the administration, including Secretary of Defense William Perry, tried to dissuade the President from his strategic blunder. In using military power against Serbia in the late 1990s, Clinton seemed to have no idea of the long historical ties between Russia and Serbia.

President Bush made further significant contributions to the alienation of the new Russian leadership by sponsoring NATO membership for former Soviet Republics (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania); abrogating the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which was the cornerstone of strategic deterrence; and deploying a national missile defense system in California and Alaska.

The Bush administration’s disdain for multilateral diplomacy and arms control, as well as its reliance on the use of force, particularly the unnecessary war against Iraq, angered the Russian leadership as well as many European leaders. President Bush explained that national missile defense as well as the regional missile defense in East Europe would not be aimed at Russia, but rather  the “world’s least-responsible states,” which the President did not name. Of course, no one in the Kremlin believed him.

While a warning to Russia, the Bush administration was a welcome relief to the neoconservative community. The appointment of right-wing ideologues who brandished a deep animosity to the Russian state included Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretaries of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Robert Gates, CIA Director Porter Goss as well as such Pentagon luminaries as Douglas Feith, William Luti, and Abram Shulsky.

In his memoir Duty, Gates prides himself for opposing any improved relations with Russia, since “making the Russians happy wasn’t exactly on my to-do list.” During meetings with his Russian military counterparts, Gates passed a childish and churlish note to Secretary of State Condi Rice stating “I’d forgotten how much I really don’t like these guys.” President Bush even favored the expansion of NATO into Ukraine and Georgia, and U.S. military support for Georgia played a significant role in the five-day war between Russia and Georgia in 2008.

President Obama initially received some credit for pushing the “reset” button in relations with Russia, but it was soon obvious that the button was simply symbolic and that no effort was being made to institutionalize bilateral relations. The Obama administration also ignored Secretary of State Baker’s verbal commitment against “leapfrogging” over a united Germany by basing U.S. fighter jets in Poland as well as favoring the deployment of a sophisticated regional missile defense in Poland and the Czech Republic. He is using the Crimea crisis to base additional fighter jets in Poland and is considering the expansion of fighter patrols over the Baltic States.

At present, there is no U.S. ambassador in Russia, and Secretary of State John Kerry has been holding talks with his Russian counterpart without any senior Russian experts at his side. The intemperate remarks of Kerry’s assistant secretary of state for European affairs last month as the crisis in Kiev was worsening speaks to the lack of diplomatic experience at Foggy Bottom.

During the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, a former U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union played a key role in convincing President John F. Kennedy that, if the United States gave Moscow some diplomatic room, the Kremlin would find a way to withdraw its missiles and bombers from Cuba – and thus avoid a military confrontation.

In the Crimean crisis, President Obama seems to be unnecessarily accommodating the right-wing criticism of his administration from politicians and pundits instead of finding a diplomatic solution to the current imbroglio. If the United States offered guarantees against the further expansion of NATO and invited Russia to take part in a multilateral economic aid program for beleaguered Ukraine, then it is possible that President Vladimir Putin would find a way to lower the Russian military presence in the Crimea.

In the meantime, the U.S. reliance on modest military steps, travel bans and economic sanctions will not bring any favorable change to the situation on the ground in Crimea. These steps will only worsen the crisis in the Ukraine and ensure that the United States and Russia cannot discuss important geopolitical matters on arms control and disarmament, nonproliferation and counter-terrorism, which finds them essentially in agreement.

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/11-1


With the invasion of Russian troops in the Crimea were violations against the BUDAPEST MENORANDUM of 1994. http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-confli … 50664.html

With the invasion of Russian troops in the Crimea were violations against the BUDAPEST MENORANDUM of 1994. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=618148791597633

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPNjhOknSAg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33oIF-ggK5U


With the invasion of Russian troops in the Crimea were violations against the BUDAPEST MENORANDUM of 1994. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu7DkoljmvQ

RUSSIA & CHINA AGREED STABILIZING UKRAINE WITH TROOPS...http://news.sky.com/story/1219922/russia-and-china-in-agreement-over-ukraine

04-03-2014
With the invasion of Russian troops in the Crimea were violations against the BUDAPEST MENORANDUM of 1994. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10 … =2&theater

http://rt.com/news/putin-statement-ukraine-russia-743
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … aders.html
http://www.european-pyramids.eu/wb/page … crimea.php
https://www.facebook.com/GMOFreeUSA/pho … =1&theater

http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A … 4EPoqA&s=1

Officers of Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) loyal to the ousted President Viktor Yanukovich have hacked phones of Estonian Minister of Foreign Affairs Urmas Paet and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton and leaked their conversation to the web. The officials discuss their impressions of what's happening in the country after the revolution. The gist of it is that Ukrainian people have no trust in any of the leaders of Maidan.
However the most striking thing of all is the fact which concerns the use of force during the revolution, particularly the snipers who killed both protesters and officers of the riot police. Mr. Paet reveals astonishing information which confirms the rumours that the snipers were employed by the leaders of Maidan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEgJ0oo3OA8

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … aders.html

«Газпром» со следующего месяца отменит льготы на газ для Украины в связи с неисполнением Киевом обязательств по контракту.
«Газпром» со следующего месяца отменит льготы на газ для Украины в связи с неисполнением Киевом обязательств по контракту.

http://bit.ly/1g72QrU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMZa6V … ata_player
https://www.youtube.com/embed/RN5eRxOQrnU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLv6Fwjc2zo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccgPmvLehNw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDHQLlkRDIo

THAT IS OF COURSE NOT THE RIGHT WAY. IN A TIME WHEN SNIPERS KILLED PEOPLE OF KIEV NOONE KNOWS WHO IS BEHIND AND SOLDIES WITHOUT ANY SIGNS ON UNIFORMS OCCUPY THE UKRAINE COUNTRY I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE  REAL VOTING FOR RUSSIA!!!


"The largest region Donbass / Donetsk: The people speaks decided for military aid from Russia and more than 50,000 citizens are in favor of a fall of leveraged fadchistischen and not for a referendum on the independence of Donbass and a possible accession to the Russian Federation legitimate! puppet government in Kiev! people are willing Kiev to storm, Today and over 100,000 people were gathered in Kharkov and liberated buildings that were occupied by 400 armed fascists! popular uprisings in Lugansk, Mariuopol, Crimea, Odessa, Krivoy Rog and Sumy! ! "SV http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiEVK27-5oM


WE ARE NO RT SUPPORTERS just listen to the words of STEVEN SEAGAL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRnXo-ZbL1A

http://www.reuters.com/places/russia

01-04-2014

IF THE NWO COMPLEX (including Putin) WANT TO MAKE CONVENTIONAL WAR after KOREA & VIETNAM They will do so and so. The pro-fracking-movement itself was successful for sure. Many in germany now talking about this technology as a wonderworld.

But it's not!
SOCIAL POISONING WITH FRACKING
Board link: Topic
https://www.facebook.com/groups/209226609114914/

1

2

3

4